Scanners give you findings. Your supervisor wants evidence. Assembling it by hand costs your team 40+ hours per audit cycle - breachr generates it as the test runs.
Designed by red teamers. Executed by agents. Validated by humans.
You get tested the way you'd actually be attacked - not the way a scanner works through a checklist.
Designed by red teamers
Every attack path in the engine originates from real offensive engagements: exploit chaining, privilege escalation, credential abuse, business-logic attacks mapped to MITRE ATT&CK - not a CVE checklist.
Executed by agents
Agentic AI runs that tradecraft continuously across your full attack surface, at a scale and cadence no human team can match.
Validated by humans
A named security professional confirms exploitability and business impact on every critical and high finding before it reaches your dashboard - and the finding records who confirmed it, and when.
The methodology itself is documented and recorded on a tamper-evident audit trail - your answer when an assessor or supervisor asks “show me how you test.”
Three Tiers of Testing. One Platform.
Same product, attacker's-perspective throughout. Start with a URL. Add credentials. Add source access. Each tier escalates in depth - all launched with one click.
How an external attacker with nothing but your URL would begin.
Just a URL - no setup, no credentials. breachr's agentic testing engine maps your attack surface against the OWASP Top 10 automatically. Free, with 2 scans per month.
How an attacker with a stolen credential would move.
Provide test credentials and the engine probes your app from the inside - login flows, authenticated endpoints, session handling, privilege escalation. Every critical finding is confirmed by a named security professional.
How an attacker who has read your code would strike.
Testing with source access - static and dynamic findings correlated, business-logic testing, human-confirmed results. In early access with a limited number of design partners; join the waitlist to be included.
Everyone finds vulnerabilities. We rank them against your business.
The same vulnerability is not the same risk for a payments institution and a scheduling app. The Business Risk Engine scores every confirmed finding against the business profile you declare - the data you hold, the regulations you fall under, how exposed the affected system is - across operational, regulatory and reputational impact, and turns that into one ordered queue your team works down.
Two companies can have the identical finding, at the identical CVSS, and get different priorities. That is the entire point.
Scores are produced by a deterministic rules engine from your declared profile and the confirmed finding, then recorded on your audit trail with the inputs that produced them. Not financial or legal advice.
| Operational impact | HIGH |
| Regulatory exposure | CRITICAL |
| Reputational impact | MEDIUM |
DORA doesn't hold your security team accountable. It holds your board.
DORA places ICT-risk accountability on the management body itself. breachr reports are written twice in one document: technical depth for the CISO, and quantified risk - mapped to PCI DSS Req. 12.3 documented risk analysis - for the executives who carry that accountability and sign.
Built for the person who signs your compliance report
What your auditor will ask - and what breachr hands you. Six capabilities behind every evidence pack.
Tamper-Evident Audit Trail
Every sensitive action is written to an append-only, hash-chained audit log (HMAC-SHA256). Each entry is signed and linked to the one before it, so a record cannot be altered or removed without breaking the chain - and you can show that it hasn't been.
Article-Level Mapping
Every finding maps to the specific article or requirement it violates - DORA Art. 24–26, PCI DSS Req. 11.4, NIS2 Art. 21 - so the assessor sees exactly which control the evidence answers.
EU Data Residency
Your data is stored in the EU - Frankfurt, eu-central-1 - and scanning runs on EU infrastructure. Designed around GDPR Article 48.
Human-Designed, AI-Executed
Attack vectors designed by our offensive security team, run continuously by agentic AI, and confirmed by a named person before you see them. A fully autonomous tool cannot give you that; a hybrid model can.
Evidence Automation
DORA and NIS2 evidence packs generated as the test runs, each finding mapped to the requirement it answers - instead of assembling the pack by hand after the fact.
Regulated-Vertical Focus
Built for EU-regulated financial services and HealthTech - the frameworks, the supervisory language, and the evidence formats your assessor expects, not a generic scanner retrofitted for compliance.
One test cycle. Two evidence packs.
Supervised under DORA and assessed under PCI DSS? You're asked to prove the same testing twice. breachr runs one programme and hands you both.
| What breachr does | Your DORA supervisor receives | Your PCI assessor receives |
|---|---|---|
| Threat-led testing of your estate | Art. 26 TLPT-aligned engagement evidence | Req. 11.4 penetration test report |
| Tests unauthenticated and authenticated paths | Art. 24/25 testing evidence | Req. 11.4 internal and external testing |
| Records every finding on a hash-chained log | Tamper-evident audit trail | Tamper-evident chain of custody |
| Prices each finding as business risk | Board-ready ICT-risk quantification | Req. 12.3 targeted risk analysis |
Covers Every Compliance Framework
Click to explore what breachr delivers for each regulation
Ready to Pass Your Next Audit?
Produce evidence your supervisor and your assessor can act on - DORA, NIS2 and GDPR, on EU infrastructure.